We were delighted when Ermintrude offered to write a blog post for #107days. Day 40 shares her thoughts and musings, and we’ve named the post in honour of her pen name, but also in acknowledgement of the constant sense of being stuck on a merry go round in dealings with Southern Health.
This is what Ermintrude had to say in support of #JusticeforLB:
I wanted to write something to remember and honour LB, his family and people who are in similar situations now. I wanted to rage against systems that allowed this to happen but as I’ve read people’s contributions, I realise I can’t add more honesty than those who have experienced the utter despair and despicable treatment in the hands of health and social care professionals. So I am just pondering some memories, fitting them together and thinking about what I can do to promote better care and better systems for people who have learning disabilities and for all people who are subject to the vagaries of a disjointed and unempathetic system. Here is my modest contribution.
When I was at school, we had weekly trips to a local residential home for people with learning disabilities. It was billed as ‘community service’. We could go instead of playing hockey. My aim wasn’t very noble when I volunteered, I have to say. I wasn’t very good at sports. Looking back though, at some of those afternoons, I remember how we didn’t really see an us/them and it became more than a way to avoid hockey. We laughed, we joked, we played silly board games, chatted about music and television and school. It became a fun way to spend the afternoons because we were simply hanging out with people who laughed at our jokes and who we enjoyed being around.
Looking back over the thirty years since then, I wonder whether this was really anything revolutionary we were doing. Or if we just need to stop looking for answers and try and find some of the solutions we have already found but just do them better. I went to university and dabbled in a little voluntary work with older people. I joined one of those countless ‘societies’ which are on offer which did little jobs around the house for older, isolated people. I pity the poor women (it was mostly women I happened to visit) who had me wallpapering their front rooms for them but in my defence, I think, in return, we always chatted for far longer than we worked. Big society. Right.
And then past university, which is where I’m going to settle a while, I picked up on the voluntary work with CSV and went to spend a year in a residential home (with staff accommodation attached as it was in the middle of nowhere) for adults with learning disabilities and epilepsy.
It is here that I’m going to settle a while because it was where I learnt a lot about epilepsy, learning disabilities and the relationships between the two. Everyone who lived in the home had epilepsy. We were given core training in managing situations, particularly when people had seizures and as a new volunteer, while I was supposed to be doing the ‘fun’ stuff in addition to the staff – like taking people out in the local area, running games groups and discussion groups in the evenings and generally just wandering around ‘being sociable’, a big part of my morning routine was supervising baths.
I remember feeling quite awkward initially about having to watch people having baths. Of course, we did it as subtlely as we could. We had privacy curtains surround the bath with a small gap to observe and often I (as all the staff would – this wasn’t something different I did) we would chatter away to people as they sat in the bath, just making sure there were no long silences or that I didn’t monopolise the conversation too much. Always, we listened out for any splashes. I did have to pull the plug out a few times when people had seizures in the bath (that was the first thing we were to do). And thinking of a man, who drowned in an NHS run hospital where the care and supervision should have been there, I often thought back to those days when we would all be taught, from the very junior people like me how to manage seizures in baths, it makes me angry. That was 20 years ago.
I moved on after that job to work in learning disabilities services for a number of years until I qualified as a social worker and switched to work with older adults but a part of my heart stayed there.
So how have we got to a situation where services exist and an organisation exists which provides them in an NHS healthcare setting where the minimum standards were not met. We aren’t talking good quality care here, we are talking about providing dangerous and neglectful care. Care which contributes to the death of people, to the death of Connor.
There are a number of things which can be put into the basket.
Firstly, poor organisations delivering poor services. This is no excuse. This is not about ‘modern’ or ‘not modern’ ways. I was doing this in 1993. I’m sure there were many problems with the places I worked in but they provided far better care, 20 years ago, than Southern Health manages now. And the CEO talks of ‘not working in a modern way’. I wonder how often she has sat outside a bathroom, listening for someone in a bath and listened if they had any seizure that she would have to act on. I wonder. I wonder how often, and maybe I’m misjudging her, she has sat with the people who receive her services, in the settings and environments which have failed to provide the basics like safe seclusion facilities, like functioning defibrillators and listened. Truly listened. While there are poor services and these services are allowed to continue to exist without censure, we can’t claim that we have a health service to be proud of. I worked in the NHS for many years. I am proud of the work I did. I’ve come across many many wonderful doctors and nurses but as an organisation, we have to be able to criticise parts without being made to feel we are criticising all. Some parts don’t function.
Secondly, and this is linked, poor oversight and lazy commissioning. Commissioners have a responsibility to check the quality of the services which they are paying for and to hold providers to account. They hold the purse-strings and have to be assured that they are happy with what is being provided. This is not about ‘avoiding scandals’ although I fear sometimes it might be. It is about seeking the best. There seems to be a lack of aspiration around some services for people with learning disabilities and my feeling is that this gap is particularly evident in health-based settings. We can talk Winterbourne endlessly and good work may be being done but we need to see more action and less rhetoric. The commissioning and commissioners are lazy because they don’t scrutinise or challenge.
Thirdly, there is the societal assumptions and expectations for people with learning disabilities. We talk about the watershed of Winterbourne but Connor died in the post-Winterbourne landscape. We talk about people moving nearer home as if that is a cure-all but poor care happens near home too. And not everyone has a home to go back to. I remember some work I did once with a man with profound learning disabilities who had no family. We can’t make assumptions about people having families who will advocate and fight for them. As a society we need to fight as strongly as those families might for those without. We fail miserably here. The expectations and assumptions are set low because there isn’t much thought or consideration for difference. Some organisations say the right words but there are often lazy assumptions made.
So is there scope for change?
I hope so. We have developed a health and social care system which is routed in jargon and exclusion. I worked in health and social care for 20+ years and it confuses me. How can we expect others to understand when we can’t ourselves. We have different funding streams and different funding levels for different things. Some pots are mixed up and some are centrally commissioned, some locally commissioned, some contracted out by provider services. Some are charged and some aren’t. What a mess we have created. Instead of transformation being what it actually means, it has been tacking on poor systems (such as the extra complicated way that personal budgets have been rolled out) onto poor systems. Where is the complete redesign? The NHS moans and groans about too many changes. No, it’s too many of the wrong kinds of changes. There needs to be change. There needs to be integration but there need to be sensible people driving it. People who experience the services as recipients – not those cozied up to each other in Whitehall and local government/CCG silos chatting to the same people they have done for years and exchanging thoughts over golf in Surrey.
My hope is that we can drive these changes. For LB, and for all who need to have their voices amplified so that things can move on. Because they need to.
4 thoughts on “Day 40: Musings from the Magic Roundabout #107days”
Spot on with your comments about people who have no families. Many, many older adults are in this position. Those that left the big hospitals in the late 90s. Talk about voiceless…but I have met fantastic advocates that social work staff can utilise (if they care enough). I remember one advocate helping me show an older guy who was leaving a assessment unit around care home options. His help was invalid, and although the gentleman lacked capacity to make decisions about his care needs, he could give a view on which homes he preferred.
“Amplified”. Spot-on. Thank you.
Do higher management ever work on the “ground floor” before they are promoted to their lofty heights? What’s the training for our boards and CEOs?
What about the commissioners?
The lack of knowledge about what is going on, and the lack of high standards suggests lack of training for many in high places. I don’t mean exclusive training schemes, I mean working (for years) building up hands-on experience.
Pingback: Day 53: The golden M (iddle) #107days | #107days