Week 10: 1 in 4 MPs contacted re #LBBill, still 75% to go #107days

Wow, what a weekend of #bankholidayactivism. Ever since the #JusticeforLB campaign evolved/emerged/was born (still not sure which of these is most true) we’ve been blown away by the responsiveness of people. This weekend proved no exception and we’re delighted to now share that slightly over 25% of all MPs in Westminster have been contacted about the #LBBill.

Seriously, that’s 1 in 4 who will know about LB, who will hear about his entirely preventable death, and who hopefully will read up on the #LBBill and lend their support to it. The responses from MPs on twitter and email has been overwhelmingly positive, where they’ve had a chance to engage, and let’s be honest MPs are allowed time off too and given it was a bank holiday and the start of half term for most people, we really didn’t expect to have had pretty much any response.

LBBillContacted_25%MPs

We’re not getting complacent though. As wonderful as it is to see that all MPs in Norfolk and Devon have heard about the #LBBill there are still whole swathes of white on our map where people don’t yet know.

So this is a quick thank you, a mini celebration and a call for further action.

If you are reading this, and you care about disabled people, please take action to contact your own MP and let others know about the Bill and what it proposes. You can read Sara’s post from yesterday for more on what difference the LBBill would have made to LB – short answer is he would probably still be alive today, playing with his footy guys and chatting away to Chunky Stan.

Screenshot 2014-04-23 05.56.04

We need to make sure no other family suffer the same loss that LB’s have, that no more disabled people are denied what are essentially very basic human rights. So please take action, we need to give the #LBBill every chance to be heard in Parliament.

Thank you all.

Week 4: Deaf Ears and Force Majeure #107days

Week 4 has received a huge reaction so far on social media, it seems the issue of listening or non-listening (to families, parents, disabled people) touches a nerve for many of us. This week started with Katherine’s thoughts on Motherblame, followed by Sara’s on why it happens The moon on a stick? Today Mark Neary has kindly offered his perspective:

Deaf Ears & Force Majeure

Since being asked to write this post for the Listening to Families week of #107days Take two, I’ve been thinking back over the seven years since Steven was transitioned into adult services. It makes my heart sink to think that in that time, Steven has been barely listened to by the care professionals. If I think if I have been listened to, it registers on the scale slightly lower than barely.

In 2010, Steven spent the whole year in an ATU. Speaking his wishes never got him anywhere, so he took to singing his desire to come back home and greeted the ATU manager every morning with ‘I Want To Break Free’. At the time, I felt I was being humoured. But when we got hold of the social care records, I found it was much worse, the professionals were openly hostile to my input into Steven’s care. Don’t take my word for it. In 2011, Justice Peter Jackson ruled that Steven’s Article 5 & 8 ECHR Human Rights had been breached and this is what he had to say on the subject of listening to the family:

It (Hillingdon) acted as if it had the right to make decisions about Steven, and by a combination of turning a deaf ear and force majeure, it tried to wear down Mr Neary’s resistance, stretching its relationship with him almost to breaking point. It relied upon him coming to see things its way, even though, as events have proved, he was right and it was wrong.

And later in the judgement:

Regrettably, once Mr Neary’s initial resistance to its plans weakened and fell away, Hillingdon appears to have taken a dim view of his concerns. In an e-mail dated 22 February from the social worker to the support unit, the following appears: “There is always going to be something or other that Mr Neary will bring up and more often than not we are having to appease his needs rather than Steven’s. I know that it seems that you as a team are constantly being questioned but this will be the case because Mr Neary wants to find issues with the care that other people give Steven. We just need to ensure like we have that we are working together for the best outcome for Steven.” It is now accepted by Hillingdon that Mr Neary had done nothing to deserve this disrespect. The unfortunate tone of the message demonstrates that even at this stage the expression “working together” did not include working together with Steven’s father in the true sense and that Hillingdon’s thinking had by this stage become adversarial. Worse, the professional view was withheld from Mr Neary, perhaps because revealing it would have provoked a renewed challenge.

And in his final summing up:

Hillingdon’s approach was calculated to prevent proper scrutiny of the situation it had created. In the weeks after Steven’s admission, it successfully overbore Mr Neary’s opposition. It did not seriously listen to his objections and the suggestion that it might withdraw its support for Steven at home was always likely to have a chilling effect. Once Mr Neary’s resistance was tamed, the question of whether Steven was in the right place did not come under any balanced assessment.

The big question is why? Our story is not unique. Why do professionals take such a combative stance when straight forward dialogue and listening to the family experience ought to be so valuable?

I think Sara hit the nail on the head yesterday and it comes back to the person being seen as not really human. So, by default, the person’s family occupies a strange space in the official framing, whereby they are not seen as like other families. It doesn’t matter how you present, what your life experience is, you are forced into a lesser than box.

I’ve obviously thought about this many times since the court case and I believe that the main reason why families are side-lined are because they have to be.

Social care is built on several building blocks of illusions. The illusion of the social care world couldn’t sustain itself if the family’s reality was heard and attended to. To maintain the illusion the family has to be ignored or attacked. At home, we get very few incidents of challenging behaviour with Steven; at the ATU, they were recording up to 30 per week. So, to protect the illusion that the professionals knew best and that the Unit was the best place for him, the attacks on me started; they believed I didn’t report honestly. They believed that I wouldn’t continue with behaviour management programmes. And we move into very dangerous territory if I dared to suggest that, actually, I didn’t need a behaviour management programme.

It must be awful, going into work each day, terrified that at any moment, you might fall into the king’s new clothes abyss. Once at a meeting, I laughed. It was spontaneous. I certainly didn’t mean to do it. The terror in the room was palpable. The abyss opened. I think Steven and I paid quite a high price for nearly exposing the void.

As part of the group trying to make #LBBill become a reality, I get scared. Empowering legislation like the Human Rights Act, The Mental Capacity Act often seems to have the adverse effect. Having rights involves listening to families. It also involves giving some power away. That’s an almighty shift and one that seems a very long way away.

StevenN

Day 101: An animated, poetic call to act #107days

Day 101 is another shared day, this time between David and Trish.

This is what David had to say about why he chose to support #107days and #JusticeforLB:

When I first enquired about sponsoring one of the 107 days I wasn’t quite sure what I was going to do, I just felt compelled to do something. Having agreed to prepare a prezi with Sara for her slot at the 3 Lives Event earlier in the year and then meeting her and listening to her speak, for me this was a no brainer. Why? Well, because aside from the sheer frustration I felt at hearing Connor’s story,  seeing Sara hold it together whilst presenting in order to get everyone to sit up and recognise that this actually happened. I was also very embarrassed. Embarrassed by the fact this could happen, embarrassed that this has happened so many times before, and embarrassed that I am part of system that has let Connor and so many others down so badly.

When I think about my own career and what has driven me to want to do more, make change and challenge this very system; I cite three core experiences all of which resulted in the self same feelings of embarrassment, annoyance and at times times anger. I offer these here, for the reader to contemplate, digest and act; yes to act. Just in the same way you have taken action to arrive here at this very site, to read these very words and to want to make change and denounce any form of abuse, neglect or infringement of rights.

So, number one. In 1987 whilst working in a residential care setting I accompanied four people with learning disabilities to visit a local pub. Sadly, no sooner had we purchased our drinks, the manager beckoned me over and said ‘no disrespect mate, but I don’t want them in my pub’. I had to go back to the people I was with and ask them to ‘drink up’. We were made to leave and all eyes across the pub tracked our departure as we were ushered out. The next day I complained to the brewery and went to the local press. The community revolted and the landlords reputation was besmirched. Justice.

In 1991 whilst undertaking my nurse training, I observed two members of staff assault one of the residents of the home where I was on placement. I wont go into the details, but lets just say this happened out of the blue. On their part, I never really got to know if this was some random act of boredom, a show of their status or prowess, a reminder to the people who lived there to ‘know their place’ or simply ‘a game’ like the ones staff described  during the panorama footage. When I spontaneously reacted during this event, I was taken by the two staff members (interestingly both of them were ex military personnel) and dragged outside in the snow and into a closed courtyard. I was given a clear message that I ‘better not mention this anything to anyone, or else’. The next day I made a formal complaint and reported what I saw. An investigation ensued and the two thugs were later dismissed. Justice.

In 2001 I supported a gentleman with learning disabilities to attend a hospital appointment in relation to the chronic ulcers on his feet and legs. During the course of the appointment the Consultant, without asking, led seven medical students into the cubicle and proceeded to talk to his protégé’s about this gentleman’s ulcers and his ‘mental subnormality’, bestowing on them, what he evidently thought was of scientific value. The gentleman, as the patient, dealt with this by pulling the jumper he was wearing over his head. The Consultant quite oblivious to this continued his oration, going on to make the announcement that the ‘best thing for this patient is to amputate his left leg’. I was incensed, outraged and again, embarrassed. The next day I wrote a letter of complaint to the Chief Executive of the Acute Trust, but instead of merely relaying my annoyance, I proposed a solution. This was gratefully accepted by the Chief Executive and as a result, my colleagues and I developed a package of awareness training for both existing hospital staff as well as medical students.

David feels strongly that sometimes we all need to act. In fact I’d go as far as to say (personal view) that by not acting, we are all endorsing this dire level of status quo, therefore we should not just feel embarrassed, but also culpable. David chose to act in Connor’s name too. He has crafted a very personal interpretation of what happened to LB. It has taken many hours of time, and much love and persistence (whatever you’re imagining double it, including one version becoming corrupted hours from finishing requiring him to start again). David could have very reasonably quit at that point but he persisted and produced this for you all to enjoy, and act on:

Sometimes assertive action is required, it’s a response to these kind of episodes, its not often the way you would have wanted things to go, but instinctively you feel you just have to do something, make change, denounce abuse or uphold peoples rights. The animation is my interpretation of Connor’s journey through the Assessment and Treatment unit. #JusticeforLB? I hope so.

David’s animation is accompanied today by another creative endeavour to act as a prompt for thought, reflection and action. Trish had this to say about why she is supporting #JusticeforLB and #107days:

I am shocked and horrified by LB’s death and by the 1200 premature deaths per year of learning disabled people in our care, that’s our care, public provision. And by the determination not to look too closely into those deaths (no review board to help find and fight underlying causes). Including the death before us – missing brain tissue? Optional pathology guidelines?

We need to speak, don’t we?

Trish has penned this poem in memory of LB:

Learning Disability 2013: in memory of LB

A child, my father, playing in the fields,

needed the bathroom in his old friend’s house,

took a wrong turn – opened another door –

came face to face with a much older child

he’d never seen before.

He is long gone, I don’t know what they said.

 

Bewilderment and awe played on his face.

How many families hid a child? he asked,

not spoken of, perhaps the doctor knew,

perhaps the priest. Why silence, was it shame?

more likely fear – there wasn’t any help.

Except the institution.

 

DON’T

say it couldn’t happen here!

Don’t say we offer treatment, pay for care,

When all too often there is no-one there,

urgent requirements must wait weeks or months,

and information’s scattered on the wind!

Stop the bus!

You have the wrong driver –

roaring us back to the horrors of the past!

 

Skilled carers with the families could ensure

the bus is going in the right direction.

To a place of joy, space and old buses,

to the farm for days of work and giving,

home to parents, brothers, sisters, rest.

Day 99: Local experiences, national concerns #107days

Day 99 is another shared day. It was adopted by CHANGE and OxFSN, two organisations actually improving provision for people with learning disabilities, not just talking about it!

CHANGE are holding their national event today, together with Lumos, for people with learning disabilities ‘Our Voices, Our Choices, Our Freedom‘ in Leeds.

Screenshot 2014-06-26 11.47.15

The event aims at freeing adults, young people and children from institutions in the UK and across Europe. You can follow the day on the hashtag #voiceschoices. The twitter feed so far suggest a great day is being had.

The other group sharing Day 99 is Oxfordshire Family Support Network (OxFSN). When asked why they are supporting #107days and #JusticeforLB they said this:

Oxfordshire Family Support Network (OxFSN) is a (very) small charity that provides independent information, advice and support by families for families of people with learning disabilities. Set up by family carers who wanted to use their experience to help others in the same situation we strive to improve the lives of people with learning disabilities and their families.

We wanted to be part of the #107 days because like so many others we were shocked and saddened by what has happened to Connor and his family. Our aim as a charity is to inform, inspire and involve families of people with learning disabilities. We practice and promote person centred thinking and practice, delivering training and workshops to parents and professionals who work with our relatives and we attempted to support Connor, Sara and her family during his time in the unit. At Sara’s request we facilitated a person centred CPA meeting with Sara and staff at STATT (evidenced in the independent report into his preventable death)

Since Connor’s death we have been beavering away behind the scenes on projects we feel could make a difference to other families.

Today OxFSN, together with Healthwatch Oxfordshire, launch their new report, A local experience of national concern, dedicated to LB’s memory.

Screenshot 2014-06-26 11.39.31

 This report, funded by Healthwatch Oxfordshire forms part of a scoping process for further work which we hope will ultimately help other families around the country as well as those closer to home.

The report highlights the failures in respect of the current system in Oxfordshire and calls on local commissioners to work with families and people who use services to create services which meet their needs by working with them as ‘experts by experience’.

It has also identified a range of issues that require further scrutiny, including the following:

  • The problems associated with the transition between children’s and adult services;
  • The frequent failures to provide information and support to enable families to make informed choices about which services to use;
  • A proposal to undertake scoping work on developing a peer-to-peer network of support and advocacy for families, with the suggestion that Oxfordshire could be a potential pilot area to test out a peer advocacy and support model;
  • The importance of services and commissioners working with families to seek solutions rather than perceiving families as part of the problem.

Jan Sunman, author of the report and project worker for OxFSN  said:

‘Our purpose in writing this report was to give a voice to a very hidden group of families, and to show how they struggle with fragile support systems that need to radically change in order that they and their relatives can have a basic quality of life that the rest of us take for granted.  Families are isolated and desperate for good support and advice. They often have a poor understanding of the rights of their relatives’.

On a related note if you would like to know more about your legal position then check out our web chat #JusticeforLBLaw taking place next Monday.

Day 64: A jewel of a future #107days

Day 64 was adopted by Zoe, who got in touch very early on in the #107days campaign to adopt today. Here’s why:

I first found out about LB and his family when Mark Neary posted on facebook with the awful news about Connor’s death. Like other people, I was outraged and incredulous that this type of abject neglect could happen in a unit that was supposed to be staffed by people with expertise in helping young people like Connor who are at a crisis point in their lives.

Reading Connor and his family’s backstory and then following what has happened and is still happening in the aftermath of Connor’s preventable death, I’ve been awakened to the horrors of ATUs and moved to join the #JusticeforLB and #107days campaigns in order to do what I can to help.

Our school, Bright Futures has an active PTA called ‘Friends of Bright Futures School’. We run regular events and had scheduled a jewellery party to raise funds for FBFS. When the #107days campaign was announced, we decided instead to use to the event to raise money towards the costs of legal representation at Connor’s inquest. We also hope to raise awareness of Connor’s preventable death and the subsequent dehumanising treatment of his family by Southern Heath Trust by getting some coverage in our local paper.

I’ve written some thoughts on what I think are the components of a quality service for young people with developmental difficulties who are at a crisis point in their lives. Many others have made similar suggestions. There have been conferences, academic papers, TV documentaries and public inquiries about what has gone wrong in the ATU system and more widely in services for people with learning difficulties… but on a weekly basis we are still hearing of more young people and their families who have been subjected to neglect, bad practice and abuse.

It is heartening to see the groundswell of grassroots support for #JusticeforLB and it is my fervent hope that we can harness our ‘crowd-rage’ to bring about the change that is needed.

Day64_School

Bright Futures where the jewellery party will be held – more photos later.

Day 47: Indignation and initiative vs ‘institutional inertia’ #107days

We are now on Day 47 of #107days, rapidly approaching our half way point, and we are delighted to share with you a post written by Saba Salman, who adopted today. Saba wrote the initial piece on LB’s death and #JusticeforLB, published in the Guardian on Day 0. It has been phenomenally heartening to see an independent person’s take on our campaign, but we’ll leave you to judge that for yourselves:

Imagine if you had £3,500 a week to run a campaign, consider the awareness you could raise with even a tenth of that.

Now multiply £3,500 – the average weekly cost of a place at an assessment and treatment unit (ATU) – by 3,250 – the number of learning disabled people in such units. That’s an indicator of the costs involved in using controversial Winterbourne View-style settings.

Just over a year ago, 18-year-old Connor Sparrowhawk, aka Laughing Boy or LB, was admitted to a Southern Health NHS Trust ATU where he died an avoidable death 107 days later.

In contrast to the vast amounts spent by commissioners on places like the one where LB died, the #JusticeforLB campaign sparked by his death is ‘funded’ solely by goodwill. No PR team crafting on-message missives, no policy wonks collating information, no consultants advising on publicity.

#107days of action began on Wednesday 19 March, a year to the day Connor went into Slade House, and continues until the first anniversary of his death, Friday 4 July 2014. Half the aim – and I’ll come to the other half at the end of this post – is to “inspire, collate and share positive actions being taken to support #JusticeforLB and all young dudes”. The goal is to capture the “energy, support and outrage” ignited by LB’s death.

Day47

This post, around halfway through #107days and written from the perspective of having reported on #JusticeforLB at the start of the campaign, looks at what’s been achieved so far.

I’m not describing the “abject failure” of progress to rid social care of Winterbourne-style settings – care minister Norman Lamb’s words – the sort of apologies for care where compassion is often as absent as any actual assessment or treatment. Nor do I write about the errors at Southern (you can read here about the enforcement action from health regulators after a string of failures). I want to explain, from my interested observer’s standpoint, the impact of #107days and what might set it apart from other awareness drives.

It’s a timely moment to do this. It is now three years since Winterbourne, less than a week after Panorama yet again highlighted abuse and neglect in care homes and a few days since new information on the use of restraint and medication for people in units like LB’s. The campaign reflects not only the importance of #JusticeforLB, but also an unmet need to finally change attitudes towards vulnerable people (and it’s not as if we don’t know what “good care” looks like).

There is a palpable sense that the #107days campaign is different. Talking to journalists, families, activists, academics, bloggers and social care providers, the word “campaign” doesn’t adequately define #107days. It’s an, organic, evolving movement for change, a collaborative wave of effort involving a remarkably diverse range of folk including families, carers, people with learning disabilities, advocates, academics and learning disability nurses.

It’s worth noting the campaign’s global reach. LB’s bus postcard has been pictured all over the UK and as far away as Canada, America, Ireland, France, Majorca and São Paulo. LB has touched a bus driver in Vancouver and brownies in New Zealand.

Because of the blog run by Connor’s mother Sara Ryan (launched long before his death), LB and his family are not mere statistics in a report or anonymised case study “victims” in yet another care scandal. Instead we have Connor: a son, brother, nephew, friend, schoolmate, neighbour – and much more – deprived of his potential. We forget neither his face and personality nor the honest grief of a family facing “a black hole of unspeakable and immeasurable and incomprehensible pain”.

Yet while anger and angst has sparked and continues to fan #107days, the overwhelming atmosphere is optimistic. There is the sense that outrage, can should and will force action (and it’s worth mentioning, as #JusticeforLB supporters have stressed, exposing bad care begs a focus on good care – lest we forget and tar all professional carers with the same apathetic brush).

Both in its irreverent attitude and wide-ranging activity, this is no orthodox campaign. It is human and accessible because of its eclectic and inclusive nature (see, for example, Change People’s easy read version of the report into Connor’s death). And at the heart of the campaign lie concrete demands. In its bottom-up, social media-driven, grassroots approach and dogged determination, #107days has a hint of the Spartacus campaign against welfare cuts (Spartacus activist Bendy Girl is supporting #JusticeforLB through her work with the newly formed People First England).

As for impact so far, daily blogposts have attracted over 25,000 hits with visitors from 63 countries. There have been 7,000 or so tweets (which pre-date #107days) 1,380 followers, the #justiceforLB hashtag has been used more than 3,560 times and the #107days hashtag more than 2,000 times in the last month (thanks to George Julian for the number crunching). So far, the total amount raised for Connor’s family’s legal bills is around £10,000.

I can’t list each #107day but suffice it to say that the exhaustive activities and analysis so far include creative and sporting achievements highlighting the campaign as well as education-based events (or as Sara described progress on only Day 6 of #107: “Tiny, big, colourful, grey, staid, chunky, smooth, uncomfortable, funny, powerful, mundane, everyday, extraordinary, awkward, shocking, fun, definitely not fun, political, politically incorrect, simple, random, harrowing, personal, in your face, committed, joyful, loud, almost forgettable, colourful and whatever events”).

Along with blogs, beach art and buses in Connor’s name, there’s an LB truck, the tale of two villages’ awareness-raising, a hair-raising homage, autobiographical posts about autism, siblings’ stories, sporting activities, and lectures. And patchwork, postcards, pencil cases, paddling (by a 15-year-old rower) and petition-style letters (open to signatures).

It’s worth noting that while learning disability should be but isn’t a mainstream media issue, there have been pieces in the Guardian and Daily Telegraph plus important coverage on Radio 4 , BBC Oxford and in the specialist pressBBC Radio Oxford‘s Phil Gayle and team have followed developments relentlessly and Sting Radio produced an uplifting show on the first day of the campaign. While some of this coverage pre-dates #107days, it reflects how media attention has been captured solely thanks to the efforts of Connor’s family and supporters (links to other coverage are on Sara’s blog).

As for reaching the key figures who could help make the changes #107days wants, the campaign has had contact with health secretary Jeremy Hunt, care minister Norman Lamb, chief inspector of adult social care Andrea Sutcliffe and Winterbourne improvement programme director Bill Mumford, care provider organisations and staff.

Earlier, I described the first half of #107days’ aims to “inspire, collate and share positive actions” and capture the “energy, support and outrage” ignited by LB’s death. Based on the efforts and impact so far, and the campaign is clearly on track.

But the remaining target – to “ensure that lasting changes and improvements are made” – is more elusive, largely because it lies outside the responsibility and remit of members of the #107days campaign.

Contrast the collective nerve, verve, indignation and initiative of the last 46 days to what Norman Lamb calls the historic “institutional inertia” of NHS and local government commissioners, a cultural apathy undermining plans to move more people out of Winterbourne-style units.

The existence and continued use of ATUs might be a challenging and seemingly intractable problem. But that’s not good enough a reason for commissioners – and those who run and govern such places – to ignore the problem. There are good intentions coming from some in authority; people just need to put their collective muscles where their mouths are. Doing that sometime during the remaining 60 days of the campaign for Connor seems like the right thing to do.

Day 46: The violence of disablism #107days

Today was adopted by Katherine Runswick-Cole; when I asked her why she’d got involved with supporting #JusticeforLB and #107days, this is what she had to say:

I first met Sara at a Disability Studies conference, we were both studying for our PhDs. Meeting Sara was exciting because we shared the same research interests but also because we were both mothers to young dudes. Sara and I stayed in touch, wrote a couple of academic papers together and every so often we would find ourselves at the same conference and have a bit of a gossip about life, the universe and everything! In fact it was Sara who introduced me to the joys of Twitter and, of course, I followed her blog.

Like many other people who have been touched by #JusticeforLB, I never met Connor, but through knowing Sara and reading her blog, I felt as if I had. The stories Sara told with such love and humour remind me of my own dude, and her family stories so often overlapped with ours.

Katherine, has written today’s post with Dan Goodley (who you’ll also meet again on Day 100). This is what she is up to:

I’m now Senior Research Fellow in Disability Studies & Psychology at Manchester Metropolitan University and I’ve been invited to give a paper on the theme of disability and violence on 6th May, 2014 at the Norwegian Network of Disability Research 6th Research Conference in Lillehammer, Norway. The blog posted today, co-written with my friend and colleague, Dan Goodley reflects on some of the things I’ll be talking about in Norway, including #JusticeforLB.

LB_Day46

This is what they have to say:

The Violence of Disablism 

Like many people, we’ve been following the #JusticeforLB #107days closely. We’ve been inspired by the actions of others in support of the campaign and horrified by the revelations of the terrible treatment experienced by people with learning disabilities that continue to unfold as the #107days continue.

We’ve followed many of the blogs that have commented on the tragic death of LB including those of Chris Hatton, Rich Watts, George Julian, Jenny Morris and of course Sara Ryan‘s own powerful and deeply moving blog, and we’ve wondered what we have to add to what has already been said so clearly and carefully by many others.

However, it was Jenny Morris’ claim that Connor was a victim of ‘institutionalised disablism’ that prompted us to write this post. We agree with Jenny and her comments made us reflect on what we had previously written about disability and violence.

In 2011, we published an academic paper called “The Violence of Disablism” in the Journal of Sociology of Health and Illness. The paper was written as part of a wider research project focused on the lives disabled children (“Does Every Child Matter, post-Blair?: the interconnections of disabled childhoods”). Violence was not initially a focus for the study, but, sadly, in our work with children and families violence emerged as a distressing and disturbing theme.

We heard about disabled children being bullied on the bus, in toilets and on the street. We heard about families being marginalized and excluded because their children were “different”. We heard about schools where children were man handled and emotionally bullied by staff. We described this as the “violence of disablism”.

The violence that Connor experienced tragically ended in his death: the report of inquiry into his death documented that he was subjected to numerous incidents of ‘face down restraint’ in his 107 days in the unit. In the end his life was rendered so value-less that no one thought it worthwhile to check on a young man with epilepsy while he was alone in the bath.

The report of inquiry made it clear that individuals played their part in Connor’s death.  It is right that the staff members who left Connor alone to drown should be held to account, but there is a danger that if we focus our anger at individuals alone, then we will be failing Connor and all the dudes who continue to be subjected to the violence of disablism. Focusing on individuals allows wider communities to distance themselves from the bad acts of few bad individuals. Much of the response of the service provider has been to suggest that focusing on individuals means that we don’t have to pay attention to the multi-faceted, mundane and engrained ways in which the violence of disablism operates in peoples’ lives. We desperately need to address the systems and cultures that contributed to Connor’s death.

Winterbourne View and Slade House were located on industrial estates, how many other Assessment and Treatment Units are located on the margins of their communities? What other group of people, apart from people with learning disabilities, would ever experience a ‘stay’ or, indeed, live on the edge of an industrial estate? Currently, despite Winterbourne JIP, 1,500 people still live in ATUs, 14 of them are children.

As we saw in our research project, the processes that de-value the lives of people with learning disabilities are everywhere and they start when disabled children are young. To recognise that we live in a world that is inherently disablist permits us to start addressing a number of urgent questions:

  • Why are adults with learning disabilities endlessly placed in the periphery of our communities?
  • What kinds of things do we value about human beings and how might we broaden our values to include those human beings who might not fit with the ‘normal’ category?
  • How helpful is it to talk about normal? Might it be more helpful to think of all of us as abnormal, anomalous, different and divergent?
  • What needs to be done NOW to honour #JusticeforLB?

Katherine will be sharing this paper in Norway in a few days time; as the ripples of what happened to Connor, and the JusticeforLB campaign, spread ever further, it really is time for change. The final word goes to Katherine (and Sara):

In the midst of the tragedy and devastation that follows Connor’s death, I do believe that change is possible and that through the #107days tweets, blogs, papers, presentations and marathons, we can begin to build that change. So our post is written as we hold on to Sara’s words that “if anyone can effect change in the way in which learning disabled children/adults are treated, I’d lay my money on a bunch of (raging) mothers of disabled children”.

#RagingMother

Day 10: Hand in Hands with AL #107days

One of the aims of #107days was to raise awareness about #JusticeforLB and all young dudes and dudettes, about the reality that they face and some of the alternatives that should ideally be available. To some extent what happened to LB was due to the lack of appropriate provision available to him and his family as he approached adulthood. A number of people have got in touch to adopt a day for #107days to share some of the work they are doing to improve things. Day 10 was adopted by Michelle Dudderidge, this is what she had to say about why she got involved:

You can see from the images of LB he was a good-looking, happy young dude. He was tragically failed by the people who should have fully supported him and kept him safe from harm. #JusticeforLB is important to me as LB’s death needs to be acknowledged and those responsible need to be punished to ensure this doesn’t happen to anyone else!

This is Michelle’s story:

In 2011, following Winterbourne View, I established a supported living service, in Hertfordshire, Hand in Hands, to support vulnerable adults with Learning Disabilities and behaviours that challenge, to live independently in their own homes.

I always wanted the organisation to stay small, to enable us to make a difference to the lives of a few individuals and not compromise the quality of the support offered and ensure I remained in control. We now have three services in North Hertfordshire, each can be home to four individuals. As we have only recently opened the second and third services we currently have six vacancies to fill across both.

My aim was, and still is, to ensure those accessing our services have the quality of life that we ourselves would wish for, in a society free from discrimination.

…and this is AL’s story, Hand in Hands first individual:

AL Before

Our journey with AL began in November 2011, 4 days after his 18th birthday. He was living at home with parents who had seen a change in behaviours since he had left Residential School and were finding him increasingly difficult to manage.

In December 2011 AL was admitted, informally, to an Assessment and Treatment unit in Buckinghamshire. AL was in the ATU for 97 days, during which time we undertook a transition period to prepare him to be moved into supported living in March 2012.

Although AL’s Psychiatric Consultant was, and still is, very supportive of what we wanted to achieve for AL, the care staff (many of whom were agency workers), were not as optimistic. The staff told us as AL is non-verbal, “he will never be able to communicate effectively”. AL now uses picture cards and basic Makaton to ensure his needs and wishes are known.

The staff told us AL would not be able to live safely in the community, as he “required far too much PRN medication to manage his unpredictable behaviours“. AL has not had any PRN medication since July 2012. He continues to be managed on a 2:1 staffing ratio, as has been the case since day one, and he is also fully supported through a robust Behaviour Management Plan.

The staff told us he must live alone as he was “far too dangerous to live with others“. AL is now living quite happily with 3 others, and this has been the case since August 2012. They all understand each other’s personal space and are respectful of AL who ‘moved in first’.

The staff told us he would never “be able to go into the community unless he was in a car“. AL will go for walks with staff (on his terms). He is always more than happy to take staff by the hand and lead them to the ice-cream van where he will wait his turn before touching the picture of what he would like.

All of these things are huge achievements for AL in the development of his social and daily living skills and there is no way he would have progressed if he was still in the ATU. AL will always be unpredictable due to his diagnosis, however, I must say how proud I am of the staff team at Hand in Hands who continue to support him to further develop everyday.

AL After

The two photos in this post are before and after pictures of AL.

Look at the difference in his eyes, the unkempt, lost and scared man has gone and he is now a happy young dude who is being supported fully to make the most of his life as an equal in society.

Day 5: 107 stories from an assessment and treatment unit #107days

Yesterday we featured WiseGrannie who is a relatively new online voice to the discussions around care and support for people with learning disabilities. Today, we feature Mark Neary and his son Steven, both experts by (bitter/shameful/appalling) experience who have been at the front of the queue when it comes to generously sharing their knowledge and wisdom with others.

Steven + Mark Neary

Mark has a very personal reason for getting involved with #107days and #JusticeforLB:

Steven went away for 3 days respite on 30th December 2009. The following day I stupidly agreed to him being moved to an assessment and treatment unit. 3 days turned into 2 weeks and it finally took 358 days for him to be returned home. In his time in the hellhole, he was unlawfully deprived his Article 5 & Article 8 human rights. The scars are still there for him and me.

I’d like to keep assessment and treatment units in the news until they’re gone for good.

Mark has shared their experience in book form, if you’d like to read more then Get Steven Home and There’s Always Something or Other with Mr Neary provides the background. The titles alone speak volumes. For #107days Mark is sharing 107 stories from Steven’s time in an assessment and treatment unit. He started slightly ahead of us and so far has shared ten stories including Shoes and Beards and Bryan Ferry and Challenging Behaviour. I promise you will laugh and cry and shake your head in disbelief, it’s powerful stuff.

Just last week Mark has also shared two post on his personal blog that bear striking resemblance to LB’s family’s experience to date: A Smile, A Shrug, A Sob and A Stab and the follow up A Smile, A Shrug, A Sob and A Security Alert. It seems there is a pattern to what can be expected, suffice to say that sense prevailed in the end for Mark and Steven, and we take strength from them, and won’t be going anywhere until things change, permanently, for young dudes and dudettes, and until we have some Justice for LB.

We’re very grateful to Mark for sharing his and Steven’s experience with us through #107days. You can follow him on twitter here @MarkNeary1 and you can wish him a Happy Birthday for today too!!